Radeon X1650 GT vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Aug 2023
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
48
-
Shading Units
6144
8
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
AD104
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.8