Radeon X1700 FSC vs GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 180W)
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2572MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Apr 2025
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 50
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2407 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2572 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR7
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.24GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
36
-
Shading Units
4608
4
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
144
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.5 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
370.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.70 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
23.70 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
370.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
44W
TDP
180W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV535
GPU Name
GB206
RV535 FSC
GPU Variant
GB206-300-A1
R500
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
21.9 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
181 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
12.0
3.0
Shader Model
6.8