Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (31.36GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
40 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (32W vs 49W)
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
490 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
31.36GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
Shading Units
40
12
TMUs
4
12
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x Molex
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R420
GPU Name
RV620
R420 GTO
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
R400
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
Shader Model
4.1
