RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs FirePro M2000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4128 additional rendering cores
FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+3154%
15620
FirePro M2000
480
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
36
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
480
144
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
115W
TDP
33W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0