RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1695MHz vs 1680MHz)
Lower TDP (115W vs 120W)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
15620
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+109%
32690
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
36
SM Count
76
4608
Shading Units
9728
144
TMUs
304
48
ROPs
112
144
Tensor Cores
304
36
RT Cores
76
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 MB
L2 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
115W
TDP
120W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
AD103
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
