RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
7640 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 210W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
+123743%
39630
FirePro 2450 Multi View
32
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2070 MHz
Base Clock
-
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
60
SM Count
-
7680
Shading Units
40
240
TMUs
4
80
ROPs
4
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
206.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
619.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
39.63 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
39.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
619.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
210W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1