Home Comparison RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs FireStream 9270

RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
6880 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 210W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4500 Ada Generation +3202%
39630
FireStream 9270
1200

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2070 MHz
Base Clock
-
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
60
SM Count
-
7680
Shading Units
800
240
TMUs
40
80
ROPs
16
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

206.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
619.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
39.63 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
39.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
619.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

210W
TDP
160W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net