RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 62% (2580MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Lower TDP (90W vs 210W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
+1291%
39630
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2849
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2070 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
60
SM Count
14
7680
Shading Units
896
240
TMUs
56
80
ROPs
32
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
206.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
619.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
39.63 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
39.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
619.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
210W
TDP
90W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
