RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (210W vs 285W)
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (2610MHz vs 2580MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
39630
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
+11%
44100
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Jun 2024
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2070 MHz
Base Clock
2340 MHz
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
60
SM Count
66
7680
Shading Units
8448
240
TMUs
264
80
ROPs
96
240
Tensor Cores
264
60
RT Cores
66
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
206.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
619.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
39.63 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
39.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
619.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
210W
TDP
285W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
