RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs Radeon R7 250E
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250E to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores
Radeon R7 250E 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 210W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
+4738%
39630
Radeon R7 250E
819
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
+3424%
19774
Radeon R7 250E
561
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Dec 2013
Quadro Ada
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2070 MHz
Base Clock
-
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
60
SM Count
-
7680
Shading Units
512
240
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
206.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
619.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
39.63 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
39.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
819.2 GFLOPS
619.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
210W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
