RTX A5500 vs Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
10192 additional rendering cores
Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 230W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500
+31474%
34100
Quadro 400
108
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
80
SM Count
6
10240
Shading Units
48
320
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
230W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
