Tesla C2075 vs Quadro P5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (180W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
Quadro P5000
+763%
8873
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Oct 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1607 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
288.5GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
20
448
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
277.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
138.6 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.873 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
277.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
180W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GP104
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
GP104-875-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
