Tesla C2075 vs Quadro Plex 2200 D2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 4GB VRAM Quadro Plex 2200 D2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
208 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (247W vs 640W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
+65%
1028
Quadro Plex 2200 D2
622
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Plex
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
783 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
30
448
Shading Units
240
56
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
640W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GT200B
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
