Tesla C2075 vs RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
RTX A1000 Embedded
+548%
6664
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
16
448
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA107S
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
520 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
