Tesla C2075 vs RTX A4000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 8GB VRAM RTX A4000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
4672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (115W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
RTX A4000 Mobile
+1573%
17200
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
Tesla
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
40
448
Shading Units
5120
56
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.4 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.20 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
268.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
115W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA104
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
