Xeon E 2186M vs EPYC Embedded 8324P
We compared two server CPUs: Xeon E 2186M with 6 cores 2.9GHz and EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Xeon E 2186M 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.9GHz vs 2.65GHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 180W)
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2666)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 12MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Xeon E 2186M
1171
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+42%
1664
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Xeon E 2186M
4912
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+171%
13349
General Parameters
Apr 2018
Release Date
Sep 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Coffee Lake-H
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel BGA 1440
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
UHD Graphics P630
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E (Coffee Lake)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Package
-
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
45 W
Power Consumption
180 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
154 mm²
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
2.9 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.65 GHz
4.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
6
Total Core Count
32
12
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
29.0
Multiplier
26.5
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
12 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
5
16
PCIe Lanes
96
