Home Comparison Xeon E 2278G vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Xeon E 2278G vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon E 2278G with 8 cores 3.4GHz and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX with 24 cores 3.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon E 2278G 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 280W)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2666)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.8GHz vs 3.4GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Xeon E 2278G
1699
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX +22%
2086
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Xeon E 2278G
8162
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX +138%
19489
VS

General Parameters

May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Coffee Lake-S WS
Core Architecture
Chagall PRO
Intel Socket 1151
Socket
AMD Socket WRX8
HD Graphics P630
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E (Coffee Lake)
Generation
Ryzen Threadripper (Zen 3 (Chagall))

Package

-
Transistor Count
16.6 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
95 W
Power Consumption
280 W
73 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
95 °C
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
180 mm²
Die Size
4x81 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
14 nm
-
I/O Die Size
416 mm²

CPU Performance

3.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
8
Total Core Count
24
16
Total Thread Count
48
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
34.0
Multiplier
38.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
2
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
4
16
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy