Home Comparison Xeon Platinum 8260M vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Xeon Platinum 8260M vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon Platinum 8260M with 24 cores 2.4GHz and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX with 24 cores 3.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon Platinum 8260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (165W vs 280W)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.8GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 35.75MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Xeon Platinum 8260M
1406
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX +48%
2086
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Xeon Platinum 8260M
13703
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX +42%
19489
VS

General Parameters

Dec 2018
Release Date
Mar 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Cascade Lake-SP
Core Architecture
Chagall PRO
Intel Socket 3647
Socket
AMD Socket WRX8
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Platinum(Cascade Lake-SP)
Generation
Ryzen Threadripper (Zen 3 (Chagall))

Package

8 billions
Transistor Count
16.6 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
165 W
Power Consumption
280 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
95 °C
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
4x81 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
14 nm
-
I/O Die Size
416 mm²

CPU Performance

2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
24
Total Core Count
24
48
Total Thread Count
48
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
38.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
35.75 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
8
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
4
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy