Xeon w5 2565X vs EPYC Embedded 8324P
We compared two server CPUs: Xeon w5 2565X with 18 cores 3.2GHz and EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Xeon w5 2565X 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.65GHz)
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 37.5MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)
Lower TDP (180W vs 240W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Xeon w5 2565X
+30%
2165
EPYC Embedded 8324P
1664
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Xeon w5 2565X
+13%
15096
EPYC Embedded 8324P
13349
General Parameters
Aug 2024
Release Date
Sep 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Sapphire Rapids
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel Socket 4677
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Sapphire Rapids)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Package
-
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
240 W
Power Consumption
180 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
3.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.65 GHz
4.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
18
Total Core Count
32
36
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
32.0
Multiplier
26.5
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
2 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
37.5 MB
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
2
AVX-512 FMA Ports
-
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2 TB
Max Memory Size
-
4
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
5
64
PCIe Lanes
96
