Home Comparison Xeon X5365 vs AMD EPYC 9174F

Xeon X5365 vs AMD EPYC 9174F

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon X5365 with 4 cores 3GHz and AMD EPYC 9174F with 16 cores 4.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon X5365 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 320W)
AMD EPYC 9174F 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (4.1GHz vs 3GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 65nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Xeon X5365
319
AMD EPYC 9174F +624%
2311
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Xeon X5365
1459
AMD EPYC 9174F +811%
13296
VS

General Parameters

Aug 2007
Release Date
Nov 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Clovertown
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 771
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon (Clovertown)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

0.582 billions
Transistor Count
52.56 billions
65 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
150 W
Power Consumption
320 W
63 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
-
Foundry
TSMC
2x143 mm²
Die Size
8x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
4
Total Core Count
16
4
Total Thread Count
32
333 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
9.0
Multiplier
41.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
4 MB per die
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR2, DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

0
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy