Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
8768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10 PCIe +2938%
31.24 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
14
9216
Shading Units
448
288
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

162.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
488.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
31.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
976.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
238W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GF100
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy