Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A100 PCIe 80 GB +7822%
19.49 TFLOPS
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Dec 2010
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1512 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

80GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
5120bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.94TB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
2
6912
Shading Units
96
432
TMUs
16
160
ROPs
8
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
80 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

225.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
609.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
77.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.49 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
9.746 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
40W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GF108
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
2.1
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy