Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A100 PCIe 80 GB +4518%
19.49 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1512 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

80GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
5120bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.94TB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
16
6912
Shading Units
128
432
TMUs
64
160
ROPs
16
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
80 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

225.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
609.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
77.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.49 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
9.746 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy