Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A100 PCIe 80 GB +4118%
19.49 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1512 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

80GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
5120bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1.94TB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
24
6912
Shading Units
192
432
TMUs
64
160
ROPs
24
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
80 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

225.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
609.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
77.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.49 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
9.746 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy