Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1710MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
8192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10G +939%
31.52 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1320 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
160bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
8
9216
Shading Units
1024
288
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
40
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GP106
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy