Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
7104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10M +14550%
23.44 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2022
Release Date
Feb 2008
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
8
7168
Shading Units
64
224
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

130.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
366.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
23.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
732.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy