Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs ATI FirePro V3800

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe +734%
4.339 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
400
40
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
43W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.627 billion
Unknown
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy