Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD FirePro W600

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe +464%
4.339 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy