Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD FireStream 9350

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe +115%
4.339 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2010
Tesla
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1440
40
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.154 billion
Unknown
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy