Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
1184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A16 PCIe +1707%
4.339 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2009
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
12
1280
Shading Units
96
40
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
12
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy