NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
10512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A40 PCIe
+5185%
37.42 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Jan 2009
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
695.8GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
84
SM Count
30
10752
Shading Units
240
336
TMUs
80
112
ROPs
32
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
194.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
584.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
37.42 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
37.42 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
584.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
204W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
