Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Lower TDP (175W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A40 PCIe +356%
37.42 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Aug 2015
Tesla
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
695.8GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
84
SM Count
-
10752
Shading Units
4096
336
TMUs
256
112
ROPs
64
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

194.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
584.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
37.42 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
37.42 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
584.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
175W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy