AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
14400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 760W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A
+25441%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Oct 2011
Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
228
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
14592
Shading Units
192
880
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
760W
TDP
62W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MI300
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
146 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
