Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
19264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +60195%
163.4 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Aug 2012
Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM3
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
192
880
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
38W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy