Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
19408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +140762%
163.4 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2010
Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
19456
Shading Units
48
880
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

750W
TDP
35W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
146 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy