Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 103% (2100MHz vs 1036MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
18432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +7600%
163.4 TFLOPS
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2017
Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
695 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1377 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
88.13GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
1024
880
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.15 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.30 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.122 TFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
55W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GM206
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy