Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (2100MHz vs 1620MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
18432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +4824%
163.4 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
May 2019
Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
1024
880
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
146 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

750W
TDP
40W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy