Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 540 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon 540 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM AMD Radeon 540 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 540 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Radeon 540 +69%
0.908 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Sep 2008
Polaris
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
32bit
Memory Bus
448bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
384
Shading Units
216
24
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.93 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
28.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
908.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
908.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
56.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GT200
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy