Intel Arc 130T Mobile vs AMD FirePro A300
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc 130T Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 130T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 143% (2200MHz vs 905MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc 130T Mobile
+467%
3.942 TFLOPS
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2025
Release Date
Jun 2012
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
28
ROPs
8
112
Tensor Cores
-
7
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
61.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
123.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
7.885 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.942 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
985.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
3 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
