Intel Arc 130T Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc 130T Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 130T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
848 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc 130T Mobile
+4231%
3.942 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2025
Release Date
Apr 2010
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
896
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
16
28
ROPs
8
112
Tensor Cores
-
7
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
61.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
123.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
7.885 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.942 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
985.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
-
3 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
