Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs Intel UHD Graphics
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 161% (2350MHz vs 900MHz)
896 additional rendering cores
Intel UHD Graphics 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc 140T Mobile
+1992%
4.813 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics
0.23 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2025
Release Date
Jan 2021
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
460.8 GFLOPS
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
Rocket Lake GT1
-
-
-
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
3 nm
Process Size
14 nm+++
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
