Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs ATI FireGL V7600

Intel Arc A310 vs ATI FireGL V7600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 127W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310 +600%
2.688 TFLOPS
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Aug 2007
Alchemist
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
768
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
R600
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
R600 GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
127W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy