Intel Arc A310 vs AMD FirePro S7000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
+10%
2.688 TFLOPS
FirePro S7000
2.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Aug 2012
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Pitcairn
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
