Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs AMD FirePro S9170

Intel Arc A310 vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +94%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Jul 2015
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
768
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Hawaii
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy