Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
+279%
2.688 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
768
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
204W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GT200B
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
