Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 63% (1750MHz vs 1072MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
+8%
2.688 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 X2
2.47 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Nov 2013
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
1006 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1152
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.73 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.9 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.470 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
102.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GK104
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
