Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

Intel Arc A350 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +2033%
3.072 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Alchemist
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
3
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
RV630
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy