Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

Intel Arc A350 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +3740%
3.072 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2010
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
80
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
M93
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy