Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce 920A

Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce 920A

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350M and 2GB VRAM GeForce 920A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1150MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 33W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350M +140%
1.766 TFLOPS
GeForce 920A
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2015
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 900A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1001 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.02GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
55.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
3.533 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.766 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
441.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GK208B
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N16V-GM
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy