Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1455MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350M
1.766 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +406%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
3072
48
TMUs
96
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
6
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
55.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
3.533 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
1.766 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
441.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
AD107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy